Belarus vs Georgia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Belarus
67.6%
in 2019
Georgia
83.6%
in 2021
Belarus rank
5th
Georgia rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Belarus
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 83.6% against 67.6% in Belarus, a difference of 16.0%.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Georgia ahead.
Belarus ranks 5th and Georgia ranks 3rd of 36 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Belarus or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 83.6% against 67.6% in Belarus as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Belarus and Georgia?
- 16.0%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Georgia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Georgia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Belarus ranks 5th and Georgia ranks 3rd of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group