Armenia vs Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Armenia
64.0%
in 2022
Belarus
67.6%
in 2019
Armenia rank
8th
Belarus rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Armenia
- Belarus
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 67.6% against 64.0% in Armenia, a difference of 3.6%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 8th and Belarus ranks 5th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Belarus in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.3% | 41.7% | 11.6% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 59.9% | 66.2% | 6.3% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Armenia or Belarus?
- Belarus, at 67.6% against 64.0% in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Armenia and Belarus?
- 3.6%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Belarus?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Belarus rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Armenia ranks 8th and Belarus ranks 5th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group