Argentina vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Argentina
33.6%
in 2022
Mongolia
38.4%
in 2020
Argentina rank
19th
Mongolia rank
17th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Argentina
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 38.4% against 33.6% in Argentina, a difference of 4.8%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 19th and Mongolia ranks 17th of 36 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 52.3% | 36.1% | 16.3% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 43.0% | 38.4% | 4.6% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Argentina or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 38.4% against 33.6% in Argentina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Argentina and Mongolia?
- 4.8%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Argentina ranks 19th and Mongolia ranks 17th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group