Mongolia vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Mongolia
31.3%
in 2020
Peru
19.7%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
22nd
Peru rank
24th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 31.3% against 19.7% in Peru, a difference of 11.6%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.6 times Peru's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 22nd and Peru ranks 24th of 36 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.2% | 22.0% | 13.2% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 32.8% | 20.5% | 12.3% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 31.3% | 26.6% | 4.6% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Mongolia or Peru?
- Mongolia, at 31.3% against 19.7% in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Mongolia and Peru?
- 11.6%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Mongolia ranks 22nd and Peru ranks 24th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group