Kyrgyzstan vs Ukraine: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Kyrgyzstan
56.6%
in 2020
Ukraine
59.0%
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
11th
Ukraine rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 59.0% against 56.6% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 2.4%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Ukraine ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th and Ukraine ranks 9th of 36 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.6% | 56.0% | 15.4% | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 52.6% | 56.7% | 4.1% | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 56.6% | 59.0% | 2.5% | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Kyrgyzstan or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 59.0% against 56.6% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine?
- 2.4%, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th and Ukraine ranks 9th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group