Kazakhstan vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Kazakhstan
47.6%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan
56.6%
in 2020
Kazakhstan rank
12th
Kyrgyzstan rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 56.6% against 47.6% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 9.0%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th of 36 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 41.2% | 53.8% | 12.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 52.4% | 56.6% | 4.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Kazakhstan or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 56.6% against 47.6% in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Kazakhstan ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group