Georgia vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Georgia
103.9%
in 2021
South Africa
100.0%
in 2021
Georgia rank
1st
South Africa rank
2nd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Georgia
- South Africa
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 103.9% against 100.0% in South Africa, a difference of 3.9%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Georgia ranks 1st and South Africa ranks 2nd of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 92.0% | 116.9% | 25.0% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 103.9% | 100.0% | 3.9% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Georgia or South Africa?
- Georgia, at 103.9% against 100.0% in South Africa as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Georgia and South Africa?
- 3.9%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Georgia ranks 1st and South Africa ranks 2nd of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group