Ecuador vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Ecuador
33.8%
in 2022
Mongolia
31.3%
in 2020
Ecuador rank
20th
Mongolia rank
22nd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Ecuador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 33.8% against 31.3% in Mongolia, a difference of 2.5%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mongolia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 20th and Mongolia ranks 22nd of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 31.8% | 32.8% | 1.1% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 35.1% | 31.3% | 3.9% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Ecuador or Mongolia?
- Ecuador, at 33.8% against 31.3% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 2.5%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Ecuador ranks 20th and Mongolia ranks 22nd of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group