Belarus vs Moldova: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Belarus
63.0%
in 2019
Moldova
65.2%
in 2018
Belarus rank
7th
Moldova rank
6th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Belarus
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 65.2% against 63.0% in Belarus, a difference of 2.2%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 7th and Moldova ranks 6th of 36 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Belarus or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 65.2% against 63.0% in Belarus as of 2018.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Belarus and Moldova?
- 2.2%, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Moldova?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do Belarus and Moldova rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Belarus ranks 7th and Moldova ranks 6th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group