Armenia vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Armenia
57.5%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
56.6%
in 2020
Armenia rank
10th
Kyrgyzstan rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Armenia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 57.5% against 56.6% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 10th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th of 36 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 59.2% | 52.3% | 6.9% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 73.9% | 56.6% | 17.3% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Armenia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Armenia, at 57.5% against 56.6% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.9%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Armenia ranks 10th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group