Armenia vs Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Armenia
57.5%
in 2022
Belarus
63.0%
in 2019
Armenia rank
10th
Belarus rank
7th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Armenia
- Belarus
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 63.0% against 57.5% in Armenia, a difference of 5.5%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 10th and Belarus ranks 7th of 36 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.5% | 58.7% | 9.2% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 58.9% | 75.2% | 16.2% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Armenia or Belarus?
- Belarus, at 63.0% against 57.5% in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Armenia and Belarus?
- 5.5%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Belarus?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Belarus rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Armenia ranks 10th and Belarus ranks 7th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group