Kyrgyzstan vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Kyrgyzstan
76.4%
in 2020
South Africa
73.7%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan rank
13th
South Africa rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- South Africa
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 76.4% against 73.7% in South Africa, a difference of 2.7%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th and South Africa ranks 14th of 37 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 75.9% | 141.9% | 66.0% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 76.4% | 76.5% | 0.0% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Kyrgyzstan or South Africa?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 76.4% against 73.7% in South Africa as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Kyrgyzstan and South Africa?
- 2.7%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th and South Africa ranks 14th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group