Kazakhstan vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Kazakhstan
76.7%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan
76.4%
in 2020
Kazakhstan rank
12th
Kyrgyzstan rank
13th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 76.7% against 76.4% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th of 37 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 72.0% | 76.4% | 4.3% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 83.8% | 76.4% | 7.4% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Kazakhstan or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 76.7% against 76.4% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.3%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Kazakhstan ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group