Georgia vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Georgia
108.0%
in 2021
Serbia
112.7%
in 2022
Georgia rank
6th
Serbia rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 112.7% against 108.0% in Georgia, a difference of 4.7%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 6th and Serbia ranks 4th of 37 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 92.9% | 108.3% | 15.3% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 108.0% | 116.8% | 8.8% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Georgia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 112.7% against 108.0% in Georgia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Georgia and Serbia?
- 4.7%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Georgia ranks 6th and Serbia ranks 4th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group