Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Chile
69.7%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
76.4%
in 2020
Chile rank
15th
Kyrgyzstan rank
13th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 76.4% against 69.7% in Chile, a difference of 6.7%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 15th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th of 37 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.5% | 51.0% | 14.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 30.7% | 72.0% | 41.3% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 42.2% | 76.4% | 34.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 76.4% against 69.7% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6.7%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Chile ranks 15th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group