Brazil vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Brazil
61.1%
in 2022
South Africa
73.7%
in 2021
Brazil rank
17th
South Africa rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Brazil
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 73.7% against 61.1% in Brazil, a difference of 12.6%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 17th and South Africa ranks 14th of 37 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 52.4% | 143.6% | 91.2% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 60.6% | 75.1% | 14.5% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Brazil or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 73.7% against 61.1% in Brazil as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Brazil and South Africa?
- 12.6%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Brazil and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Brazil ranks 17th and South Africa ranks 14th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group