Armenia vs Moldova: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Armenia
86.5%
in 2022
Moldova
91.1%
in 2018
Armenia rank
10th
Moldova rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Armenia
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 91.1% against 86.5% in Armenia, a difference of 4.6%.
That makes Moldova's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Moldova ahead.
Armenia ranks 10th and Moldova ranks 9th of 37 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Armenia or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 91.1% against 86.5% in Armenia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Armenia and Moldova?
- 4.6%, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Moldova?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do Armenia and Moldova rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Armenia ranks 10th and Moldova ranks 9th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group