Peru vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Peru
34.9%
in 2022
South Africa
39.7%
in 2021
Peru rank
29th
South Africa rank
27th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 39.7% against 34.9% in Peru, a difference of 4.8%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Peru ranks 29th and South Africa ranks 27th of 34 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 38.1% | 137.5% | 99.4% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 40.8% | 54.2% | 13.3% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Peru or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 39.7% against 34.9% in Peru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Peru and South Africa?
- 4.8%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Peru ranks 29th and South Africa ranks 27th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group