Mongolia vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Mongolia
43.1%
in 2020
Uruguay
45.7%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
22nd
Uruguay rank
21st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Mongolia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 45.7% against 43.1% in Mongolia, a difference of 2.6%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 22nd and Uruguay ranks 21st of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.5% | 40.2% | 1.3% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 40.5% | 40.6% | 0.1% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 43.1% | 46.9% | 3.8% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Mongolia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 45.7% against 43.1% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 2.6%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Mongolia ranks 22nd and Uruguay ranks 21st of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group