Kazakhstan vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Kazakhstan
52.3%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan
55.2%
in 2020
Kazakhstan rank
16th
Kyrgyzstan rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 55.2% against 52.3% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 2.9%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 16th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 43.1% | 57.7% | 14.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 57.0% | 55.2% | 1.8% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Kazakhstan or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 55.2% against 52.3% in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.9%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Kazakhstan ranks 16th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group