El Salvador vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
El Salvador
27.5%
in 2022
Peru
34.9%
in 2022
El Salvador rank
32nd
Peru rank
29th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- El Salvador
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 34.9% against 27.5% in El Salvador, a difference of 7.4%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.3 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 32nd and Peru ranks 29th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.4% | 39.4% | 10.9% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 39.3% | 39.5% | 0.2% | Peru |
| 2020s | 27.0% | 38.7% | 11.7% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, El Salvador or Peru?
- Peru, at 34.9% against 27.5% in El Salvador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between El Salvador and Peru?
- 7.4%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Peru?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do El Salvador and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- El Salvador ranks 32nd and Peru ranks 29th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group