Costa Rica vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Costa Rica
47.5%
in 2022
Mongolia
43.1%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
19th
Mongolia rank
22nd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Costa Rica
- Mongolia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 47.5% against 43.1% in Mongolia, a difference of 4.4%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 19th and Mongolia ranks 22nd of 34 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 44.4% | 40.2% | 4.2% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 55.1% | 43.1% | 12.0% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Costa Rica or Mongolia?
- Costa Rica, at 47.5% against 43.1% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 4.4%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Costa Rica ranks 19th and Mongolia ranks 22nd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group