Belarus vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Belarus
83.7%
in 2019
Poland
97.2%
in 2019
Belarus rank
4th
Poland rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Belarus
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 97.2% against 83.7% in Belarus, a difference of 13.5%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Belarus ranks 4th and Poland ranks 3rd of 34 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.0% | 79.6% | 1.6% | Poland |
| 2010s | 80.3% | 86.7% | 6.4% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Belarus or Poland?
- Poland, at 97.2% against 83.7% in Belarus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Belarus and Poland?
- 13.5%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Belarus ranks 4th and Poland ranks 3rd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group