Armenia vs Kazakhstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Armenia
53.0%
in 2022
Kazakhstan
52.3%
in 2021
Armenia rank
15th
Kazakhstan rank
16th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Armenia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 53.0% against 52.3% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 15th and Kazakhstan ranks 16th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 56.1% | 39.9% | 16.2% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 52.9% | 54.7% | 1.8% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Armenia or Kazakhstan?
- Armenia, at 53.0% against 52.3% in Kazakhstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Armenia and Kazakhstan?
- 0.7%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Kazakhstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Armenia and Kazakhstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Armenia ranks 15th and Kazakhstan ranks 16th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group