Argentina vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Argentina
37.4%
in 2022
Peru
34.9%
in 2022
Argentina rank
28th
Peru rank
29th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Argentina
- Peru
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 37.4% against 34.9% in Peru, a difference of 2.5%.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 28th and Peru ranks 29th of 34 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 59.1% | 38.9% | 20.2% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 41.0% | 38.9% | 2.1% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Argentina or Peru?
- Argentina, at 37.4% against 34.9% in Peru as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Argentina and Peru?
- 2.5%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Peru?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Argentina and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Argentina ranks 28th and Peru ranks 29th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group