Mexico vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Mexico
32.2%
in 2022
Peru
31.0%
in 2022
Mexico rank
31st
Peru rank
32nd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Mexico
- Peru
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 32.2% against 31.0% in Peru, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 31st and Peru ranks 32nd of 34 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.0% | 34.7% | 10.3% | Mexico |
| 2010s | 36.4% | 33.8% | 2.7% | Mexico |
| 2020s | 33.8% | 33.7% | 0.1% | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Mexico or Peru?
- Mexico, at 32.2% against 31.0% in Peru as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Mexico and Peru?
- 1.2%, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Mexico and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Mexico ranks 31st and Peru ranks 32nd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group