Ecuador vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Ecuador
35.7%
in 2022
Mongolia
42.0%
in 2020
Ecuador rank
27th
Mongolia rank
24th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Ecuador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 42.0% against 35.7% in Ecuador, a difference of 6.3%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 27th and Mongolia ranks 24th of 34 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 51.9% | 39.9% | 12.0% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 55.9% | 42.0% | 13.9% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Ecuador or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 42.0% against 35.7% in Ecuador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 6.3%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Ecuador ranks 27th and Mongolia ranks 24th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group