Chile vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Chile
44.2%
in 2022
Uruguay
44.6%
in 2022
Chile rank
21st
Uruguay rank
20th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Chile
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 44.6% against 44.2% in Chile, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 21st and Uruguay ranks 20th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.5% | 40.4% | 6.1% | Chile |
| 2010s | 35.7% | 46.1% | 10.4% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 39.0% | 45.0% | 6.0% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Chile or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 44.6% against 44.2% in Chile as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Chile and Uruguay?
- 0.4%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uruguay?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Chile ranks 21st and Uruguay ranks 20th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group