Belarus vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Belarus
80.6%
in 2019
Serbia
89.1%
in 2022
Belarus rank
5th
Serbia rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Belarus
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 89.1% against 80.6% in Belarus, a difference of 8.5%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Belarus ranks 5th and Serbia ranks 4th of 34 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Belarus or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 89.1% against 80.6% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Belarus and Serbia?
- 8.5%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Belarus ranks 5th and Serbia ranks 4th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group