Armenia vs Turkey: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Armenia
57.9%
in 2022
Turkey
60.2%
in 2019
Armenia rank
13th
Turkey rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Armenia
- Turkey
How they compare
Turkey currently reports 60.2% against 57.9% in Armenia, a difference of 2.3%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Turkey ahead.
Armenia ranks 13th and Turkey ranks 11th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Turkey in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.7% | 55.8% | 7.2% | Turkey |
| 2010s | 56.5% | 56.4% | 0.1% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Armenia or Turkey?
- Turkey, at 60.2% against 57.9% in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Armenia and Turkey?
- 2.3%, with Turkey ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Turkey?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Turkey rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Armenia ranks 13th and Turkey ranks 11th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group