Kazakhstan vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Kazakhstan
48.2%
in 2021
Mongolia
45.5%
in 2020
Kazakhstan rank
18th
Mongolia rank
20th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Kazakhstan
- Mongolia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 48.2% against 45.5% in Mongolia, a difference of 2.7%.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mongolia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 18th and Mongolia ranks 20th of 30 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.2% | 35.1% | 24.8% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 25.3% | 44.0% | 18.7% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 55.8% | 45.5% | 10.3% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Kazakhstan or Mongolia?
- Kazakhstan, at 48.2% against 45.5% in Mongolia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Kazakhstan and Mongolia?
- 2.7%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mongolia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Kazakhstan ranks 18th and Mongolia ranks 20th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group