Armenia vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Armenia
46.5%
in 2022
Mongolia
45.5%
in 2020
Armenia rank
19th
Mongolia rank
20th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Armenia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 46.5% against 45.5% in Mongolia, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 19th and Mongolia ranks 20th of 30 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.2% | 42.3% | 2.9% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 56.6% | 40.5% | 16.1% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 52.9% | 45.5% | 7.4% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Armenia or Mongolia?
- Armenia, at 46.5% against 45.5% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Armenia and Mongolia?
- 1.0%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Armenia ranks 19th and Mongolia ranks 20th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group