Armenia vs Chile: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Armenia
46.5%
in 2022
Chile
55.5%
in 2022
Armenia rank
19th
Chile rank
16th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Armenia
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 55.5% against 46.5% in Armenia, a difference of 9.0%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Chile ahead.
Armenia ranks 19th and Chile ranks 16th of 30 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Chile in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.2% | 49.8% | 4.6% | Chile |
| 2010s | 51.3% | 41.0% | 10.4% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 49.7% | 43.6% | 6.0% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Armenia or Chile?
- Chile, at 55.5% against 46.5% in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Armenia and Chile?
- 9.0%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Chile?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Chile rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Armenia ranks 19th and Chile ranks 16th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group