Armenia vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Armenia
71.3%
in 2022
Mongolia
72.1%
in 2020
Armenia rank
17th
Mongolia rank
16th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Armenia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 72.1% against 71.3% in Armenia, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 17th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 34 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.4% | 59.1% | 9.3% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 75.6% | 62.7% | 12.9% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 83.3% | 72.1% | 11.2% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Armenia or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 72.1% against 71.3% in Armenia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Armenia and Mongolia?
- 0.8%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Armenia ranks 17th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group