Armenia vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Armenia
71.3%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
77.7%
in 2020
Armenia rank
17th
Kyrgyzstan rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Armenia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 77.7% against 71.3% in Armenia, a difference of 6.4%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 17th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 34 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 76.8% | 76.7% | 0.1% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 83.3% | 77.7% | 5.7% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Armenia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 77.7% against 71.3% in Armenia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6.4%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Armenia ranks 17th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group