Georgia vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Georgia
93.6%
in 2021
Serbia
53.3%
in 2022
Georgia rank
1st
Serbia rank
2nd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 93.6% against 53.3% in Serbia, a difference of 40.3%.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.8 times Serbia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 1st and Serbia ranks 2nd of 35 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 79.2% | 33.8% | 45.4% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 93.6% | 43.7% | 49.9% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Georgia or Serbia?
- Georgia, at 93.6% against 53.3% in Serbia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Georgia and Serbia?
- 40.3%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Georgia ranks 1st and Serbia ranks 2nd of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group