Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Costa Rica
24.4%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
25.9%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
15th
Kyrgyzstan rank
12th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 25.9% against 24.4% in Costa Rica, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 15th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th of 35 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 23.7% | 20.9% | 2.8% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 54.9% | 25.9% | 28.9% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 25.9% against 24.4% in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.5%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Costa Rica ranks 15th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group