Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Belarus
27.9%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
25.9%
in 2020
Belarus rank
11th
Kyrgyzstan rank
12th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 27.9% against 25.9% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 2.0%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 11th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th of 35 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Belarus, at 27.9% against 25.9% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.0%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Belarus ranks 11th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group