Argentina vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Argentina
24.6%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
25.9%
in 2020
Argentina rank
13th
Kyrgyzstan rank
12th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Argentina
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 25.9% against 24.6% in Argentina, a difference of 1.3%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th of 35 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.0% | 17.8% | 10.2% | Argentina |
| 2010s | 22.4% | 20.7% | 1.8% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 34.9% | 25.9% | 8.9% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Argentina or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 25.9% against 24.6% in Argentina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.3%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Argentina ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group