Argentina vs Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Argentina
24.6%
in 2022
Belarus
27.9%
in 2019
Argentina rank
13th
Belarus rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Argentina
- Belarus
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 27.9% against 24.6% in Argentina, a difference of 3.3%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 13th and Belarus ranks 11th of 35 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Argentina or Belarus?
- Belarus, at 27.9% against 24.6% in Argentina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Argentina and Belarus?
- 3.3%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Belarus?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Belarus rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Argentina ranks 13th and Belarus ranks 11th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group