Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Costa Rica
21.1%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
24.3%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
14th
Kyrgyzstan rank
12th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 24.3% against 21.1% in Costa Rica, a difference of 3.2%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 14th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20.4% | 20.5% | 0.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 49.1% | 24.3% | 24.8% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 24.3% against 21.1% in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 3.2%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Costa Rica ranks 14th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group