Armenia vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Armenia
46.6%
in 2022
Serbia
52.8%
in 2022
Armenia rank
4th
Serbia rank
2nd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Armenia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 52.8% against 46.6% in Armenia, a difference of 6.2%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 4th and Serbia ranks 2nd of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 35.1% | 28.9% | 6.2% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 39.3% | 45.4% | 6.2% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Armenia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 52.8% against 46.6% in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Armenia and Serbia?
- 6.2%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Armenia ranks 4th and Serbia ranks 2nd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group