Argentina vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Argentina
24.6%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
24.3%
in 2020
Argentina rank
11th
Kyrgyzstan rank
12th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Argentina
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 24.6% against 24.3% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 11th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th of 34 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.0% | 14.0% | 14.0% | Argentina |
| 2010s | 22.4% | 20.1% | 2.4% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 34.9% | 24.3% | 10.5% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Argentina or Kyrgyzstan?
- Argentina, at 24.6% against 24.3% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.3%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Argentina ranks 11th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group