Panama vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Panama
41.6%
in 2023
Serbia
55.3%
in 2022
Panama rank
5th
Serbia rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Panama
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 55.3% against 41.6% in Panama, a difference of 13.7%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.3 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 5th and Serbia ranks 3rd of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 36.7% | 35.9% | 0.8% | Panama |
| 2020s | 44.2% | 48.8% | 4.6% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Panama or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 55.3% against 41.6% in Panama as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Panama and Serbia?
- 13.7%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Panama and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Panama ranks 5th and Serbia ranks 3rd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group