Panama vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Panama
41.6%
in 2023
Poland
52.3%
in 2019
Panama rank
5th
Poland rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Panama
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 52.3% against 41.6% in Panama, a difference of 10.7%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.3 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Panama ranks 5th and Poland ranks 4th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.4% | 25.9% | 8.5% | Poland |
| 2010s | 38.5% | 31.4% | 7.1% | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Panama or Poland?
- Poland, at 52.3% against 41.6% in Panama as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Panama and Poland?
- 10.7%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Panama and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Panama ranks 5th and Poland ranks 4th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group