Mongolia vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Mongolia
22.3%
in 2020
Peru
19.6%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
19th
Peru rank
20th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 22.3% against 19.6% in Peru, a difference of 2.7%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Peru ahead.
Mongolia ranks 19th and Peru ranks 20th of 34 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.4% | 22.0% | 8.6% | Peru |
| 2010s | 19.5% | 20.3% | 0.8% | Peru |
| 2020s | 22.3% | 26.5% | 4.2% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Mongolia or Peru?
- Mongolia, at 22.3% against 19.6% in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Mongolia and Peru?
- 2.7%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Mongolia ranks 19th and Peru ranks 20th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group