Kazakhstan vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Kazakhstan
28.8%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan
27.1%
in 2020
Kazakhstan rank
14th
Kyrgyzstan rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 28.8% against 27.1% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 14th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 34 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 24.9% | 24.0% | 0.9% | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 30.5% | 27.1% | 3.4% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Kazakhstan or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 28.8% against 27.1% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.7%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Kazakhstan ranks 14th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group