Georgia vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Georgia
103.9%
in 2021
Serbia
55.3%
in 2022
Georgia rank
1st
Serbia rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 103.9% against 55.3% in Serbia, a difference of 48.6%.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.9 times Serbia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 1st and Serbia ranks 3rd of 34 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 86.0% | 38.0% | 48.0% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 103.9% | 48.8% | 55.1% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Georgia or Serbia?
- Georgia, at 103.9% against 55.3% in Serbia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Georgia and Serbia?
- 48.6%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Georgia ranks 1st and Serbia ranks 3rd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group