Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Costa Rica
29.2%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
27.1%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
13th
Kyrgyzstan rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 29.2% against 27.1% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 2.1%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 34 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 28.9% | 20.7% | 8.1% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 65.0% | 27.1% | 37.9% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Costa Rica, at 29.2% against 27.1% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.1%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Costa Rica ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group