Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Chile
22.4%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
27.1%
in 2020
Chile rank
18th
Kyrgyzstan rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 27.1% against 22.4% in Chile, a difference of 4.7%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Chile ranks 18th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 34 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.0% | 20.3% | 3.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 17.8% | 18.6% | 0.7% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 25.5% | 27.1% | 1.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 27.1% against 22.4% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 4.7%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Chile ranks 18th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group